Blue Green Line in Header
 


Welcome to the California Trade Report, Beacon Economics’ monthly analysis of California’s international trade activity. This report analyzes data released by the U.S. Census Bureau’s Foreign Trade Division and pinpoints important trends in the state’s import/export industry, identifying potential effects on the state’s economy. The report is only a sampling of the kind of economic research and data analysis available from Beacon Economics.

SUBSCRIBE
Receive the California
Trade Report by email
 
more info

The California Trade Report represents only a sample of the custom, comprehensive forecasts and economic analysis available from Beacon Economics. Learn More

Despite Storm Clouds, Growth Continues For California Exports

April 5, 2018 - California’s merchandise export trade rose in February, according to a Beacon Economics’ analysis of U.S. trade statistics released this morning by the U.S. Census Bureau. Foreign shipments by California businesses totaled $14.62 billion for the month, a nominal 8.6% gain over the $13.46 billion recorded a year earlier.

The state’s exports of manufactured goods in February rose by 4.4% to $9.30 billion from $8.91 billion one year earlier. However, exports of non-manufactured goods (chiefly agricultural products and raw materials) surged 28.0% to $2.01 billion from $1.57 billion. Re-exports, meanwhile, increased by 10.7% to $3.30 billion from $2.98 billion.

“At least for now, economic fundamentals, a weak dollar, and robust overseas demand for a wide range of California products, continue to drive our exports higher," said Jock O’Connell, Beacon Economics’ International Trade Adviser.

Almond exports, he noted, were up over 35% from February 2017. Since April 2nd, however, almonds shipments to China face an additional 15% tariff imposed by Beijing in retaliation for heightened U.S. import duties on Chinese steel and aluminum. 

California accounted for 11.4% of the nation’s overall merchandise export trade in February. 

“For now, this is a trade scuffle, not a trade war,” said Robert Kleinhenz, Economist and Executive Director of Research at Beacon Economics. “Even so, California farmers and manufacturers who export along with those in the import-export segments of the logistics industry, must keep a close eye on developments over the coming weeks and months, and may feel the pinch before too long if the trade restrictions under consideration are fully implemented.”

California Imports Increase
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that California was the state-of-destination for 17.7% of all U.S. merchandise imports in February, with a value of $33.25 billion, 12,0% higher than the $29.68 billion in imported goods in February 2017. Manufactured imports totaled $29.67 billion, up 12.6% from $26.34 billion. Non-manufactured imports were valued at $3.58 billion, 6.9% higher than the $3.35 billion recorded one year earlier (see our caveats about state-of-destination import statistics at the end of this report).

A Closer Look At The Numbers
As always, Beacon Economics cautions against reading too much into month-to-month fluctuations in state export statistics, especially when focusing on specific commodities or destinations. Significant variations can occur as the result of unusual developments or exceptional one-off trades and may not be indicative of underlying trends. For that reason, Beacon Economics compares the latest three months for which data are available (i.e., December 2017-February 2018) with the corresponding period one year earlier.

Leading Export Commodities
California's merchandise exports during the last quarter of the year totaled $43.64 billion, a nominal gain of 7.0% from the $40.79 billion in the same period in the previous year. Of the ten categories of California exports that normally see shipments valued at more than $1 billion in the latest three-month period), eight reported increases.

On the plus side, shipments of Computer & Electronic Products (computers and peripherals; communication, audio, and video equipment; navigational controls; and electro-medical instruments) moved up by 9.9% to $10.87 billion from $9.89 billion. Exports of Non-Electrical Machinery (machinery for industrial, agricultural and construction uses as well as ventilation, heating, and air conditioning equipment) improved by 15.7% to $4.62 billion from $3.99 billion.

Shipments of Miscellaneous Manufactured Commodities (a catchall category of merchandise ranging from medical equipment to sporting goods) edged higher by 12.0% to $3.56 billion from $3.18 billion. Chemical exports (including pesticides and fertilizers; pharmaceutical products; paints and adhesives; soap and cleaning products; and raw plastics, resins, and rubber) gained 10.2% to $3.44 billion from $3.04 billion.

Agricultural exports jumped by 22.9% to $3.69 billion from $3.0 billion. Shipments abroad of Food & Kindred goods grew 7.0% to $2.27 billion from $2.12 billion. Exports of Electrical Equipment and Appliances increased 5.0% to $1.84 billion from $1.75 billion. Exports of Petroleum and Coal Products leaped 23.6% to $1.37 billion from $1.11 billion. Waste & Scrap exports roared ahead by 39.2% to $1.30 billion from $935 million. Exports of Fabricated Metal Products were up by 6.1% to $1.02 billion from $957 million.

On the minus side, the state’s exports of Transportation Equipment (automobiles, trucks, trains, boats, airplanes, and their parts) were off by 12.8% to $4.42 billion from $5.07 billion. Sharp declines in exports of Aerospace Products to Taiwan and France helped send California’s Transportation Equipment shipments lower. Exports of Primary Metal Manufacturing products fared worse, tumbling 42.9% to $973 million from $1.71 billion.

Destinations 
Mexico handily maintained its position atop the list of California’s most important export destinations during the latest three-month period. Shipments south of the border grew by 13.5% to $7.01 billion from $6.18 billion. China edged ahead of Canada as the state’s second largest export market, with shipments increasing 5.0% to $4.17 billion from $3.97. Canada slipped to third place even though California’s exports north of the border grew by 13.7% to $4.13 billion from $3.64 billion. In fourth place was Japan, which imported $3.31 billion worth of California goods, an increase of 10.5% from $2.99 billion during the same period a year earlier. South Korea moved ahead of Hong Kong to round out the roster of California’s top five foreign markets. Exports to South Korea rose 21.8% to $2.68 billion from 2.20 billion. (Hong Kong saw its California imports plummet by 23.6% to $2.61 billion from $3.41 billion one year ago.)

The state’s export trade with the economies of East Asia edged lower by 0.3% to $16.05 billion from $16.10 billion. China accounted for 26.0% of California’s exports to Asia, followed by Japan with a 20.6% share. By sharp contrast, California’s exports to the European Union rose by 10.0% to $7.99 billion from $7.26 billion. That increase was powered largely by a 39.2% surge in California exports to Germany.

Continuing to emphasize the economic importance of the North American Free Trade Agreement, Mexico and Canada together accounted for 25.5% of California’s merchandise export trade in the latest three-month period, up from 24.1% in the same period one year ago.

Mode of Transport
The latest three-month period saw 48.3% of the state’s $43.64 billion merchandise export trade depart by air, while waterborne transport carried 29.8% of the outbound trade. The balance of the state’s exports moved overland.

The Outlook
Since our last report a month ago, the trade policy pot has been stirred and then re-stirred. First came U.S. tariffs on imported steel and aluminum that were initially imposed universally but then were quickly revised to exclude most friendly steel and aluminum exporters. China was not among those favored by this revision and,  almost predictably, came Beijing’s response in the form of their own tariffs (really surcharges on existing import duties) levied against a range of U.S. products including fruits, nuts, wines, pork and, not to be ignored, aluminum waste and scrap.

Washington then upped the ante by publishing an extensive list of Chinese products that would be hit with 25% tariffs, to which Beijing countered with its own list of new 25% tariffs it might impose on U.S. exports ranging from soybeans to aerospace products. These tariff threats will now be the subject of negotiations over the next few months.

For the time being, a new 15% tariff on U.S. exports of fruits, nuts, and wines took effect on April 2, which is not good news for those California growers and winemakers directly affected by the extra import charge. More broadly, California’s agricultural exports to China last year totaled $732 million, only about 5.4% of the worldwide total of $13.68 billion, so the new tariffs are not calamitous for the state’s agricultural sector. Moreover, if Chinese food and wine importers who have worked assiduously to develop a presence for California Grown products in China believe the tariff is a bargaining chip that will soon be removed, they might decide to absorb the cost rather than disrupt the markets they have built.

For now, we expect a surge in the March export numbers as exporters deliver shipments of California goods to China before Chinese customs collectors ratchet up levies. In the bigger picture, continued strength in the U.S. economy should buoy imports while weakness in the dollar and growth among our trading partners will continue to fuel exports.


Note: The U.S. Commerce Department has been publishing state-of-destination import statistics since 2008. Beacon Economics has long felt that state import data provide a highly misleading indication of the state in which imported goods were ultimately consumed. As a major gateway for the nation’s foreign trade, California has consistently been credited with an out-sized share of U.S. merchandise imports. (January 2018 statistics, for example, indicate that California is the destination of 18.3% of all merchandise imports and 19.1% of all manufactured imports.) However, we now believe that the process by which state-of-destination import statistics are compiled has become stable enough to be used to measure relative increases or decreases in the value of imported goods consumed or otherwise used by residents or businesses located in California. We strongly emphasize that we are solely interested in identifying trends. We continue to believe it is not useful to use state export and import statistics to calculate a state trade balance.
 

Graphics (click to expand)



 

 

Beacon Economics is a leading provider of economic and data analysis. Our research informs the financial and economic strategies of major hedge funds, industry, cities and counties, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations.

For more information, please view our research and analytics page or contact:

Director of Business Development Rick Smith at 858-997-1834 or Rick@BeaconEcon.com, or

Managing Partner Sherif Hanna at 310-571-3399 or Sherif@BeaconEcon.com.

 
No Nonsense Economics blog feature image

Client Quotes

"Beacon Economics has become an invaluable resource to the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, providing us with data and research that informs our efforts to rebuild the region’s economy."
Gary Toebben, President & CEO, Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

"Beacon Economics has substantially increased economic literacy here in Sonoma County."
Ben Stone, Director, Sonoma County Economic Development Board

"The professional and technically skilled staff at Beacon Economics delivered an excellent product that has been key to our District’s long term planning and fiscal health."
Dave Collins, Assistant General Manager, Finance and Management Services, East Bay Regional Park District